"In Khazaria, sheep, honey, and Jews exist in large
quantities." Muqaddasi, Descriptio Imperii Moslemici
(tenth century).
THE evidence quoted in the previous pages indicates that -
contrary to the traditional view held by nineteenth-century
historians - the Khazars, after the defeat by the Russians in
965, lost their empire but retained their independence within
narrower frontiers, and their Judaic faith, well into the thirteenth
century. They even seem to have reverted to some extent to their
erstwhile predatory habits. Baron comments:
-
In general, the reduced Khazar kingdom persevered. It waged
a more or less effective defence against all foes until
the middle of the thirteenth century, when it fell victim
to the great Mongol invasion set in motion by Jenghiz Khan.
Even then it resisted stubbornly until the surrender of
all its neighbours. Its population was largely absorbed
by the Golden Horde which had established the centre of
its empire in Khazar territory. But before and after the
Mongol upheaval the Khazars sent many offshoots into the
unsubdued Slavonic lands, helping ultimately to build up
the great Jewish centres of eastern Europe.1
Here, then, we have the cradle of the numerically strongest
and culturally dominant part of modern Jewry. .The "offshoots"
to which Baron refers were indeed branching out long before
the destruction of the Khazar state by the Mongols - as the
ancient Hebrew nation had started branching into the Diaspora
long before the destruction of Jerusalem. Ethnically, the Semitic
tribes on the waters of the Jordan and the Turko-Khazar tribes
on the Volga were of course "miles apart", but they had at least
two important formative factors in common. Each lived at a focal
junction where the great trade routes connecting east and west,
north and south intersect; a circumstance which predisposed
them to become nations of traders, of enterprising travellers,
or "rootless cosmopolitans" - as hostile propaganda has unaffectionately
labelled them. But at the same time their exclusive religion
fostered a tendency to keep to themselves and stick together,
to establish their own communities with their own places of
worship, schools, residential quarters and ghettoes (originally
self- imposed) in whatever town or country they settled. This
rare combination of wanderlust and ghetto-mentality,
reinforced by Messianic hopes and chosen-race pride, both ancient
Israelites and mediaeval Khazars shared - even though the latter
traced their descent not to Shem but to Japheth.
2
This development is well illustrated by what one might call
the Khazar Diaspora in Hungary. .We remember that long before
the destruction of their state, several Khazar tribes, known
as the Kabars, joined the Magyars and migrated to Hungary. Moreover,
in the tenth century, the Hungarian Duke Taksony invited a second
wave of Khazar emigrants to settle in his domains (see above,
III, 9). Two centuries later John Cinnamus, the Byzantine chronicler,
mentions troops observing the Jewish law, fighting with the
Hungarian army in Dalmatia, AD 1154.2 There may have been small
numbers of "real Jews" living in Hungary from Roman days, but
there can be little doubt that the majority of this important
portion of modern Jewry originated in the migratory waves of
Kabar-Khazars who play such a dominant part in early Hungarian
history. Not only was the country, as Constantine tells us,
bilingual at its beginning, but it also had a form of double
kingship, a variation of the Khazar system: the king sharing
power with his general in command, who bore the title of Jula
or Gyula (still a popular Hungarian first name). The system
lasted to the end of the tenth century, when St Stephen embraced
the Roman Catholic faith and defeated a rebellious Gyula - who,
as one might expect, was a Khazar, "vain in the faith and refusing
to become a Christian".3 .This episode put an end to the double
kingship, but not to the influence of the Khazar-Jewish community
in Hungary. A reflection of that influence can be found in the
"Golden Bull" - the Hungarian equivalent of Magna Carta - issued
AD 1222 by King Endre (Andrew) II, in which Jews were forbidden
to act as mintmasters, tax collectors, and controllers of the
royal salt monopoly - indicating that before the edict numerous
Jews must have held these important posts. But they occupied
even more exalted positions. King Endre's custodian of the Revenues
of the Royal Chamber was the Chamberlain Count Teka, a Jew of
Khazar origin, a rich landowner, and apparently a financial
and diplomatic genius. His signature appears on various peace
treaties and financial agreements, among them one guaranteeing
the payment of 2000 marks by the Austrian ruler Leopold II to
the King of Hungary. One is irresistibly reminded of a similar
role played by the Spanish Jew Hasdai ibn Shaprut at the court
of the Caliph of Cordoba. Comparing similar episodes from the
Palestinian Diaspora in the west and the Khazar Diaspora in
the east of Europe, makes the analogy between them appear perhaps
less tenuous..It is also worth mentioning that when King Endre
was compelled by his rebellious nobles to issue, reluctantly,
the Golden Bull, he kept Teka in office against the Bull's express
provisions. The Royal Chamberlain held his post happily for
another eleven years, until papal pressure on the King made
it advisable for Teka to resign and betake himself to Austria,
where he was received with open arms. However, King Endre's
son Bela IV, obtained papal permission to call him back. Teka
duly returned, and perished during the Mongol invasion.*[I am
indebted to Mrs St G. Saunders for calling my attention to the
Teka episode, which seems to have been overlooked in the literature
on the Khazars.]4
3
The Khazar origin of the numerically and socially dominant
element in the Jewish population of Hungary during the Middle
Ages is thus relatively well documented. It might seem that
Hungary constitutes a special case, in view of the early Magyar-Khazar
connection; but in fact the Khazar influx into Hungary was merely
a part of the general mass-migration from the Eurasian steppes
toward the West, i.e., towards Central and Eastern Europe. The
Khazars were not the only nation which sent offshoots into Hungary.
Thus large numbers of the self-same Pechenegs who had chased
the Magyars from the Don across the Carpathians, were forced
to ask for permission to settle in Hungarian territory when
they in turn were chased by the Kumans; and the Kumans shared
the same fate when, a century later, they fled from the Mongols,
and some 40000 of them "with their slaves" were granted asylum
by the Hungarian King Bela.5 .At relatively quiescent times
this general westward movement of the Eurasian populations was
no more than a drift; at other times it became a stampede; but
the consequences of the Mongol invasion must rank on this metaphoric
scale as an earthquake followed by a landslide. The warriors
of Chief Tejumin, called "Jinghiz Khan", Lord of the Earth,
massacred the population of whole cities as a warning to others
not to resist; used prisoners as living screens in front of
their advancing lines; destroyed the irrigation network of the
Volga delta which had provided the Khazar lands with rice and
other staple foods; and transformed the fertile steppes into
the "wild fields" - dikoyeh pole - as the Russians
were later to call them: an unlimited space without farmers
or shepherds, through which only mercenary horsemen pass in
the service of this or that rival ruler - or people escaping
from such rule".6 .The Black Death of 1347-8 accelerated the
progressive depopulation of the former Khazar heartland between
Caucasus, Don and Volga, where the steppe-culture had reached
its highest level - and the relapse into barbarism was, by contrast,
more drastic than in adjoining regions. As Baron wrote: "The
destruction or departure of industrious Jewish farmers, artisans
and merchants left behind a void which in those regions has
only recently begun to be filled."7.Not only Khazaria was destroyed,
but also the Volga Bulgar country, together with the last Caucasian
strongholds of the Alans and Kumans, and the southern Russian
principalities, including Kiev. During the period of disintegration
of the Golden Horde, from the fourteenth century onward, the
anarchy became, if possible, even worse. "In most of the European
steppes emigration was the only way left open for populations
who wanted to secure their lives and livelihood".8 The migration
toward safer pastures was a protracted, intermittent process
which went on for several centuries. The Khazar exodus was part
of the general picture. .It had been preceded, as already mentioned,
by the founding of Khazar colonies and settlements in various
places in the Ukraine and southern Russia. There was a flourishing
Jewish community in Kiev long before and after the Rus took
the town from the Khazars. Similar colonies existed in Perislavel
and Chernigov. A Rabbi Mosheh of Kiev studied in France around
1160, and a Rabbi Abraham of Chernigov studied in 1181 in the
Talmud School of London. The "Lay of Igor's Host" mentions a
famous contemporary Russian poet called Kogan - possibly a combination
of Cohen (priest) and Kagan.9 Some time after Sarkel, which
the Russians called Biela Veza, was destroyed the Khazars
built a town of the same name near Chernigov.10 .There is an
abundance of ancient place names in the Ukraine and Poland,
which derive from "Khazar" or "Zhid" (Jew): Zydowo, Kozarzewek,
Kozara, Kozarzow, Zhydowska Vola, Zydaticze, and so on. They
may have once been villages, or just temporary encampments of
Khazar-Jewish communities on their long trek to the west.11
Similar place-names can also be found in the Carpathian and
Tatra mountains, and in the eastern provinces of Austria. Even
the ancient Jewish cemeteries of Cracow and Sandomierz, both
called "Kaviory", are assumed to be of Khazar-Kabar origin.
.While the main route of the Khazar exodus led to the west,
some groups of people were left behind, mainly in the Crimea
and the Caucasus, where they formed Jewish enclaves surviving
into modern times. In the ancient Khazar stronghold of Tamatarkha
(Taman), facing the Crimea across the straits of Kerch, we hear
of a dynasty of Jewish princes who ruled in the fifteenth century
under the tutelage of the Genovese Republic, and later of the
Crimean Tartars. The last of them, Prince Zakharia, conducted
negotiations with the Prince of Muscovi, who invited Zakharia
to come to Russia and let himself be baptized in exchange for
receiving the privileges of a Russian nobleman. Zakharia refused,
but Poliak has suggested that in other cases "the introduction
of Khazar-Jewish elements into exalted positions in the Muscovite
state may have been one of the factors which led to the appearance
of the 'Jewish heresy' (Zhidovst- buyushtchik) among
Russian priests and noblemen in the sixteenth century, and of
the sect of Sabbath-observers (Subbotniki) which is
still widespread among Cossacks and peasants".12 .Another vestige
of the Khazar nation are the "Mountain Jews" in the north- eastern
Caucasus, who apparently stayed behind in their original habitat
when the others left. They are supposed to number around eight
thousand and live in the vicinity of other tribal remnants of
the olden days: Kipchaks and Oghuz. They call themselves Dagh
Chufuty (Highland Jews) in the Tat language which they
have adopted from another Caucasian tribe; but little else is
known about them.*[The above data appear in A. H. Kniper's article
"Caucasus, People of" in the 1973 printing of the Enc. Brit.,
based on recent Soviet sources. A book by George Sava, Valley
of the Forgotten People (London, 1946) contains a description
of a purported visit to the mountain Jews, rich in melodrama
but sadly devoid of factual information.] .Other Khazar enclaves
have survived in the Crimea, and no doubt elsewhere too in localities
which once belonged to their empire. But these are now no more
than historic curios compared to the mainstream of the Khazar
migration into the Polish-Lithuanian regions - and the formidable
problems it poses to historians and anthropologists.
4
The regions in eastern Central Europe, in which the Jewish
emigrants from Khazaria found a new home and apparent safety,
had only begun to assume political importance toward the end
of the first millennium. .Around 962, several Slavonic tribes
formed an alliance under the leadership of the strongest among
them, the Polans, which became the nucleus of the Polish state.
Thus the Polish rise to eminence started about the same time
as the Khazar decline (Sarkel was destroyed in 965). It is significant
that Jews play an important role in one of the earliest Polish
legends relating to the foundation of the Polish kingdom. We
are told that when the allied tribes decided to elect a king
to rule them all, they chose a Jew, named Abraham Prokownik.13
He may have been a rich and educated Khazar merchant, from whose
experience the Slav backwoodsmen hoped to benefit - or just
a legendary figure; but, if so, the legend indicates that Jews
of his type were held in high esteem. At any rate, so the story
goes on, Abraham, with unwonted modesty, resigned the crown
in favour of a native peasant named Piast, who thus became the
founder of the historic Piast dynasty which ruled Poland from
circa 962 to 1370. .Whether Abraham Prochownik existed
or not, there are plenty of indications that the Jewish immigrants
from Khazaria were welcomed as a valuable asset to the country's
economy and government administration. The Poles under the Piast
dynasty, and their Baltic neighbours, the Lithuanians,* [The
two nations became united in a series of treaties, starting
in 1386, into the Kingdom of Poland. For the sake of brevity,
I shall use the term "Polish Jews" to refer to both countries
- regardless of the fact that at the end of the eighteenth century
Poland was partitioned between Russia, Prussia and Austria,
and its inhabitants became officially citizens of these three
countries. Actually the so-called Pale of Settlement within
Imperial Russia, to which Jews were confined from 1792 onward,
coincided with the areas annexed from Poland plus parts of the
Ukraine. Only certain privileged categories of Jews were permitted
to live outside the Pale; these, at the time of the 1897 census,
numbered only 200000, as compared to nearly five million inside
the Pale - i.e., within former Polish territory.] had rapidly
expanded their frontiers, and were in dire need of immigrants
to colonize their territories, and to create an urban civilization.
They encouraged, first, the immigration of German peasants,
burghers and craftsmen, and later of migrants from the territories
occupied by the Golden Horde,*[Poland and Hungary were also
briefly invaded by the Mongols in 1241-42, but they were not
occupied - which made all the difference to their future history.]
including Armenians, southern Slavs and Khazars. .Not all these
migrations were voluntary. They included large numbers of prisoners
of war, such as Crimean Tartars, who were put to cultivate the
estates of Lithuanian and Polish landlords in the conquered
southern provinces (at the close of the fourteenth century the
Lithuanian principality stretched from the Baltic to the Black
Sea). But in the fifteenth century the Ottoman Turks, conquerors
of Byzantium, advanced northward, and the landlords transferred
the people from their estates in the border areas further inland.14
.Among the populations thus forcibly transferred was a strong
contingent of Karaites - the fundamentalist Jewish sect which
rejected rabbinical learning. According to a tradition which
has survived among Karaites into modern times, their ancestors
were brought to Poland by the great Lithuanian warrior- prince
Vytautas (Vitold) at the end of the fourteenth century as prisoners
of war from Sulkhat in the Crimea.15 In favour of this tradition
speaks the fact that Vitold in 1388 granted a charter of rights
to the Jews of Troki, and the French traveller, de Lanoi, found
there "a great number of Jews" speaking a different language
from the Germans and natives.16 That language was - and still
is - a Turkish dialect, in fact the nearest among living languages
to the lingua cumanica, which was spoken in the former
Khazar territories at the time of the Golden Horde. According
to Zajaczkowski,17 this language is still used in speech and
prayer in the surviving Karaite communities in Troki, Vilna,
Ponyeviez, Lutzk and Halitch. The Karaites also claim that before
the Great Plague of 1710 they had some thirty-two or thirty-seven
communities in Poland and Lithuania. .They call their ancient
dialect "the language of Kedar" - just as Rabbi Petachia in
the twelfth century called their habitat north of the Black
Sea "the land of Kedar"; and what he has to say about them -
sitting in the dark through the Sabbath, ignorance of rabbinical
learning - fits their sectarian attitude. .Accordingly, Zajaczkowski,
the eminent contemporary Turcologist, considers the Karaites
from the linguistic point of view as the purest present-day
representatives of the ancient Khazars.18 About the reasons
why this sect preserved its language for about half a millennium,
while the main body of Khazar Jews shed it in favour of the
Yiddish lingua franca, more will have to be said later.
5
The Polish kingdom adopted from its very beginnings under the
Piast dynasty a resolutely Western orientation, together with
Roman Catholicism. But compared with its western neighbours
it was culturally and economically an underdeveloped country.
Hence the policy of attracting immigrants - Germans from the
west, Armenians and Khazar Jews from the east - and giving them
every possible encouragement for their enterprise, including
Royal Charters detailing their duties and special privileges.
.In the Charter issued by Boleslav the Pious in 1264, and confirmed
by Casimir the Great in 1334, Jews were granted the right to
maintain their own synagogues, schools and courts; to hold landed
property, and engage in any trade or occupation they chose.
Under the rule of King Stephen Bthory (1575-86) Jews were granted
a Parliament of their own which met twice a year and had the
power to levy taxes on their co-religionists. After the destruction
of their country, Khazar Jewry had entered on a new chapter
in its history. .A striking illustration for their privileged
condition is given in a papal breve, issued in the second half
of the thirteenth century, probably by Pope Clement IV, and
addressed to an unnamed Polish prince. In this document the
Pope lets it be known that the Roman authorities are well aware
of the existence of a considerable number of synagogues in several
Polish cities - indeed no less than five synagogues in one city
alone.*[Probably Wroclaw or Cracow.] He deplores the fact that
these synagogues are reported to be taller than the churches,
more stately and ornamental, and roofed with colourfully painted
leaden plates, making the adjacent Catholic churches look poor
in comparison. (One is reminded of Masudi's gleeful remark that
the minaret of the main mosque was the tallest building in Itil.)
The complaints in the breve are further authenticated by a decision
of the Papal legate, Cardinal Guido, dated 1267, stipulating
that Jews should not be allowed more than one synagogue to a
town..We gather from these documents, which are roughly contemporaneous
with the Mongol conquest of Khazaria, that already at that time
there must have been considerable numbers of Khazars present
in Poland if they had in several towns more than one synagogue;
and that they must have been fairly prosperous to build them
so "stately and ornamental". This leads us to the question of
the approximate size and composition of the Khazar immigration
into Poland. .Regarding the numbers involved, we have no reliable
information to guide us. We remember that the Arab sources speak
of Khazar armies numbering three hundred thousand men involved
in the Muslim-Khazar wars (Chapter I, 7); and even if allowance
is made for quite wild exaggerations, this would indicate a
total Khazar population of at least half a million souls. Ibn
Fadlan gave the number of tents of the Volga Bulgars as 50000,
which would mean a population of 300000-400000, i.e., roughly
the same order of magnitude as the Khazars'. On the other hand,
the number of Jews in the Polish-Lithuanian kingdorn in the
seventeenth century is also estimated by modern historians at
500000 (5 per cent of the total population).19 These figures
do not fit in too badly with the known facts about a protracted
Khazar migration via the Ukraine to Poland-Lithuania, starting
with the destruction of Sarkel and the rise of the Piast dynasty
toward the end of the first millennium, accelerating during
the Mongol conquest, and being more or less completed in the
fifteenth-sixteenth centuries - by which time the steppe had
been emptied and the Khazars had apparently been wiped off the
face of the earth.*[The last of the ancient Khazar villages
on the Dnieper were destroyed in the Cossack revolt under Chmelnicky
in the seventeenth century, and the survivors gave a further
powerful boost to the number of Jews in the already existing
settlement areas of Poland-Lithuania.] Altogether this population
transfer was spread out over five or six centuries of trickle
and flow. If we take into account the considerable influx of
Jewish refugees from Byzantium and the Muslim world into Khazaria,
and a small population increase among the Khazars themselves,
it appears plausible that the tentative figures for the Khazar
population at its peak in the eighth century should be comparable
to that of the Jews in Poland in the seventeenth century, at
least by order of magnitude - give or take a few hundred thousand
as a token of our ignorance. There is irony hidden in these
numbers. According to the article "statistics" in the Jewish
Encyclopaedia, in the sixteenth century the total Jewish
population of the world amounted to about one million. This
seems to indicate, as Poliak, Kutschera20 and others have pointed
out, that during the Middle Ages the majority of those who professed
the Judaic faith were Khazars. A substantial part of this majority
went to Poland, Lithuania, Hungary and the Balkans, where they
founded that Eastern Jewish community which in its turn became
the dominant majority of world Jewry. Even if the original core
of that community was diluted and augmented by immigrants from
other regions (see below), its predominantly Khazar-Turkish
derivation appears to be supported by strong evidence, and should
at least be regarded as a theory worth serious discussion. .Additional
reasons for attributing the leading role in the growth and development
of the Jewish community in Poland and the rest of Eastern Europe
mainly to the Khazar element, and not to immigrants from the
West, will be discussed in the chapters that follow. But it
may be appropriate at this point to quote the Polish historian,
Adam Vetulani (my italics):
-
Polish scholars agree that these oldest settlements were
founded by Jewish emigres from the Khazar state and Russia,
while the Jews from Southern and Western Europe began to
arrive and settle only later ... and that a certain proportion
at least of the Jewish population (in earlier times,
the main bulk) originated from the east, from the Khazar
country, and later from Kievian Russia.21
6
So much for size. But what do we know of the social structure
and composition of the Khazar immigrant community? .The first
impression one gains is a striking similarity between certain
privileged positions held by Khazar Jews in Hungary and in Poland
in those early days. Both the Hungarian and Polish sources refer
to Jews employed as mintmasters, administrators of the royal
revenue, controllers of the salt monopoly, taxcollectors and
"money-lenders" - i.e., bankers. This parallel suggests a common
origin of those two immigrant communities; and as we can trace
the origins of the bulk of Hungarian Jewry to the Magyar-Khazar
nexus, the conclusion seems self-evident. .The early records
reflect the part played by immigrant Jews in the two countries'
budding economic life. That it was an important part is not
surprising, since foreign trade and the levying of customs duties
had been the Khazars' principal source of income in the past.
They had the experience which their new hosts were lacking,
and it was only logical that they were called in to advise and
participate in the management of the finances of court and nobility.
The coins minted in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries with
Polish inscriptions in Hebrew lettering (see Chapter II, 1)
are somewhat bizarre relics of these activities. The exact purpose
they served is still something of a mystery. Some bear the name
of a king (e.g., Leszek, Mieszko), others are inscribed "From
the House of Abraham ben Joseph the Prince" (possibly the minter-banker
himself), or show just a word of benediction: "Luck" or "Blessing".
Significantly, contemporary Hungarian sources also speak of
the practice of minting coins from silver provided by Jewish
owners.22 .However - in constrast to Western Europe - finance
and commerce were far from being the only fields of Jewish activity.
Some rich emigrants became landowners in Poland as Count Teka
was in Hungary; Jewish land-holdings comprising a whole village
of Jewish farmers are recorded, for instance, in the vicinity
of Breslau before 1203;23 and in the early days there must have
been Khazar peasants in considerable numbers, as the ancient
Khazar place- names seem to indicate. .A tantalizing glimpse
of how some of these villages may have come into being is provided
by the Karaite records mentioned before; they relate how Prince
Vitold settled a group of Karaite prisoners-of-war in "Krasna",
providing them with houses, orchards and land to a distance
of one and a half miles. ("Krasna" has been tentatively identified
with the Jewish small town Krasnoia in Podolia.)24 .But farming
did not hold out a future for the Jewish community. There were
several reasons for this. The rise of feudalism in the fourteenth
century gradually transformed the peasants of Poland into serfs,
forbidden to leave their villages, deprived of freedom of movement.
At the same time, under the joint pressure of the ecclesiastic
hierarchy and the feudal landlords, the Polish Parliament in
1496 forbade the acquisition of agricultural land by Jews. But
the process of alienation from the soil must have started long
before that. Apart from the specific causes just mentioned -
religious discrimination, combined with the degradation of the
free peasants into serfs - the transformation of the predominantly
agricultural nation of Khazars into a predominantly urban community
reflected a common phenomenon in the history of migrations.
Faced with different climatic conditions and farming methods
on the one hand, and on the other with unexpected opportunities
for an easier living offered by urban civilization, immigrant
populations are apt to change their occupational structure within
a few generations. The offspring of Abruzzi peasants in the
New World became waiters and restaurateurs, the grandsons of
Polish farmers may become engineers or psychoanalysts.*[The
opposite process of colonists settling on virgin soil applies
to migrants from more highly developed to under-developed regions.]
.However, the transformation of Khazar Jewry into Polish Jewry
did not entail any brutal break with the past, or loss of identity.
It was a gradual, organic process of change, which - as Poliak
has convincingly shown - preserved some vital traditions of
Khazar communal life in their new country. This was mainly achieved
through the emergence of a social structure, or way of life,
found nowhere else in the world Diaspora: the Jewish small town,
in Hebrew ayarah, in Yiddish shtetl, in Polish
miastecko. All three designations are diminutives,
which, however, do not necessarily refer to smallness in size
(some were quite big small-towns) but to the limited rights
of municipal selfgovernment they enjoyed. .The shtetl
should not be confused with the ghetto. The latter consisted
of a street or quarter in which Jews were compelled to live
within the confines of a Gentile town. It was, from the second
half of the sixteenth century onward, the universal habitat
of Jews everywhere in the Christian, and most of the Muslim,
world. The ghetto was surrounded by walls, with gates that were
locked at night. It gave rise to claustrophobia and mental inbreeding,
but also to a sense of relative security in times of trouble.
As it could not expand in size, the houses were tall and narrow-chested,
and permanent overcrowding created deplorable sanitary conditions.
It took great spiritual strength for people living in such circumstances
to keep their self-respect. Not all of them did. .The shtetl,
on the other hand, was a quite different proposition - a type
of settlement which, as already said, existed only in Poland-Lithuania
and nowhere else in the world. It was a self-contained country
town with an exclusively or predominantly Jewish population.
The shtetl's origins probably date back to the thirteenth
century, and may represent the missing link, as it were, between
the market towns of Khazaria and the Jewish settlements in Poland.
.The economic and social function of these semi-rural, semiurban
agglomerations seems to have been similar in both countries.
In Khazaria, as later in Poland, they provided a network of
trading posts or market towns which mediated between the needs
of the big towns and the countryside. They had regular fairs
at which sheep and cattle, alongside the goods manufactured
in the towns and the products of the rural cottage industries
were sold or bartered; at the same time they were the centres
where artisans plied their crafts, from wheelwrights to blacksmiths,
silversmiths, tailors, Kosher butchers, millers, bakers and
candlestick-makers. There were also letter-writers for the illiterate,
synagogues for the faithful, inns for travellers, and a heder
- Hebrew for "room", which served as a school. There were itinerant
story-tellers and folk bards (some of their names, such as Velvel
Zbarzher, have been preserved)25 travelling from shtetl
to shtetl in Poland - and no doubt earlier on in Khazaria,
if one is to judge by the survival of story-tellers among Oriental
people to our day. .Some particular trades became virtually
a Jewish monopoly in Poland. One was dealing in timber - which
reminds one that timber was the chief building material and
an important export in Khazaria; another was transport. "The
dense net of shtetls," writes Poliak,26 "made it possible
to distribute manufactured goods over the whole country by means
of the superbly built Jewish type of horse cart. The preponderance
of this kind of transport, especially in the east of the country,
was so marked amounting to a virtual monopoly - that the Hebrew
word for carter, ba'al agalah*[Literally "master of
the cart".] was incorporated into the Russian language as balagula.
Only the development of the railway in the second half of the
nineteenth century led to a decline in this trade." .Now this
specialization in coach-building and cartering could certainly
not have developed in the closed ghettoes of Western Jewry;
it unmistakably points to a Khazar origin. The people of the
ghettoes were sedentary; while the Khazars, like other semi-nomadic
people, used horse- or ox-drawn carts to transport their tents,
goods and chattel - including royal tents the size of a circus,
fit to accommodate several hundred people. They certainly had
the know-how to negotiate the roughest tracks in their new country.
.Other specifically Jewish occupations were inn-keeping, the
running of flour mills and trading in furs - none of them found
in the ghettoes of Western Europe. .Such, in broad outlines,
was the structure of the Jewish shtetl in Poland. Some
of its features could be found in old market towns in any country;
others show a more specific affinity with what we know - little
though it is - about the townships of Khazaria, which were probably
the prototypes of the Polish shtetl. .To these specific
features should be added the "pagoda-style" of the oldest surviving
wooden shtetl synagogues dating from the fifteenth
and sixteenth centuries, which is totally different from both
the native style of architecture and from the building style
adopted by Western Jews and replicated later on in the ghettoes
of Poland. The interior decoration of the oldest shtetl
synagogues is also quite different from the style of the Western
ghetto; the walls of the shtetl synagogue were covered
with Moorish arabesques, and with animal figures characteristic
of the Persian influence found in Magyar-Khazar artefacts (I,
13) and in the decorative style brought to Poland by Armenian
immigrants.27 .The traditional garb of Polish Jewry is also
of unmistakably Eastern origin. The typical long silk kaftan
may have been an imitation of the coat worn by the Polish nobility,
which itself was copied from the outfit of the Mongols in the
Golden Horde - fashions travel across political divisions; but
we know that kaftans were worn long before that by the nomads
of the steppes. The skull-cap (yarmolka) is worn to
this day by orthodox Jews - and by the Uzbeks and other Turkish
people in the Soviet Union. On top of the skull-cap men wore
the streimel, an elaborate round hat rimmed with fox-fur,
which the Khazars copied from the Khasaks - or vice versa. As
already mentioned, the trade in fox and sable furs, which had
been flourishing in Khazaria, became another virtual Jewish
monopoly in Poland. As for the women, they wore, until the middle
of the nineteenth century, a tall white turban, which was an
exact copy of the Jauluk worn by Khasak and Turkmen women.28
(Nowadays orthodox Jewesses have to wear instead of a turban
a wig made of their own hair, which is shaved off when they
get married.) .One might also mention in this context - though
somewhat dubiously - the Polish Jews' odd passion for gefillte
(stuffed) fisch, a national dish which the Polish Gentiles
adopted. "Without fish", the saying went, "there is no Sabbath."
Was it derived from distant memories of life on the Caspian,
where fish was the staple diet? .Life in the shtetl
is celebrated with much romantic nostalgia in Jewish literature
and folklore. Thus we read in a modern survey of its customs29
about the joyous way its inhabitants celebrated the Sabbath:
-
Wherever one is, he will try to reach home in time to greet
the Sabbath with his own family. The pedlar travelling from
village to village, the itinerant tailor, shoemaker, cobbler,
the merchant off on a trip, all will plan, push, hurry,
trying to reach home before sunset on Friday evening. .As
they press homeward the shammes calls through the
streets of the shtetl, "Jews to the bathhouse!"
A functionary of the synagogue, the shammes is
a combination of sexton and beadle. He speaks with an authority
more than his own, for when he calls "Jews to the bathhouse"
he is summoning them to a commandment.
The most vivid evocation of life in the shtetl is
the surrealistic amalgam of fact and fantasy in the paintings
and lithographs of Marc Chagall, where biblical symbols appear
side by side with the bearded carter wielding his whip and wistful
rabbis in kaftan and yarmolka. .It was a weird community,
reflecting its weird origins. Some of the earliest small-towns
were probably founded by prisoners of war - such as the Karaites
of Troki - whom Polish and Lithuanian nobles were anxious to
settle on their empty lands. But the majority of these settlements
were products of the general migration away from the "wild fields"
which were turning into deserts. "After the Mongol conquest",
wrote Poliak, "when the Slav villages wandered westward, the
Khazar shtetls went with them."30 The pioneers of the
new settlements were probably rich Khazar traders who constantly
travelled across Poland on the much frequented trade routes
into Hungary. "The Magyar and Kabar migration into Hungary blazed
the trail for the growing Khazar settlements in Poland: it turned
Poland into a transit area between the two countries with Jewish
communities."31 Thus the travelling merchants were familiar
with conditions in the prospective areas of resettlement, and
had occasion to make contact with the landowners in search of
tenants. "The landlord would enter into an agreement with such
rich and respected Jews" (we are reminded of Abraham Prokownik)
"as would settle on his estate and bring in other settlers.
They would, as a rule, choose people from the place where they
had lived."32 These colonists would be an assorted lot of farmers,
artisans and craftsmen, forming a more or less self-supporting
community. Thus the Khazar shtetl would be transplanted
and become a Polish shtetl. Farming would gradually
drop out, but by that time the adaptation to changed conditions
would have been completed. .The nucleus of modern Jewry thus
followed the old recipe: strike out for new horizons but stick
together.