JEWISH PERSECUTION,
Tool of the International Zionists' Plan for World Dominion
Source: Sweet Liberty [with: Jackie Patru]

Chapter 9.

Those of you who embrace Talmudism and have not studied the great works of the Talmudists might wish to verify the authenticity of claims made by researchers that it does contain the racist (and dangerous) pronouncements asserted by Mr. Strugnell, former editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and many others. That would suppose you have an unabridged version. Rather than deny the claims, do your own research.

According to Benjamin Freedman, the official translation of the Talmud into English was printed in London by the Soncino Press in 1935 in a very limited amount, although thorough researchers say that a few very damning statement have either been omitted or changed. From what we gather, there is enough left intact to make the case.

A small book titled The Talmud Unmasked, by Father I.B. Pranaitis, would be a fruitful place to begin as it will narrow the search for specific passages; however, his book focuses on the Talmudic view of the Goi, and Christians specifically. He does not address the Talmudic fascination with sex and sexual perversions. We will address that in the next section, with quotes from the Talmud.

For Christians who are interested in reading the book and would not have access to the full sixty-three volumes to authenticate the information: some time ago, I had a discussion with a Zionist Jew who has attested to the authenticity of Fr. Pranaitis' quoted excerpts from the Talmud, although he denies that all the books cited are part of the Talmud.

Incidentally, this avowed Zionist Jew just mentioned, maintains that 'a Zionist Jew is merely one who loves his homeland'. He lives in America and makes his living here, and yet his beloved homeland is Israel.

When asked how he felt about the inflated percentage of Jews in Clinton's cabinet (over 50%), given that the percentage of Jews in our population is allegedly only 3%, his response was that 'It makes us proud when one of our own does good'.

If his sense of pride in any Jew who 'does good' -- no matter what evil is committed to attain the position, power or notoriety -- is representative of the average Jew in America, there is a grave conflict of interest here. Most importantly, what they don't seem to realize is that -- as the 'lesser brethren' -- they, too, will become victims of those of theirs who 'do good'. To join the ranks of those who 'did good' would require payment of one's soul in return.

When a Christian American gains political power, and commits acts of treason against his fellow Americans, that person is not held with pride, nor celebrated by other Christian Americans. Why, then, would an American Jew express pride in a fellow Jew's achievements under the same conditions?

Having admitted he hadn't read much of the Talmud, I suggested the Zionist Jew get Father Pranaitis' book on the subject, that allegedly quotes the Talmud word-for-word and sites the sources. Having read it, I was anxious to learn if it was in fact an accurate depiction of the Talmudic writings.

Later we had a conversation by e-mail. An excerpt of the e-mail is pasted below to demonstrate the mental gymnastics... the lengths to which one will go when he is fully entrenched in religious dogma. There is little difference between Jews (in this sense) and Christians in defense of their particular denomination of 'Christianity'. . . except that Christians are not taught to hate Jews, nor avoid them, nor intentionally deceive and cheat them.

J.P.: Have you checked out your Talmud in reference to the Talmud Unmasked? You say you read the book but haven't said you've checked it out and found it to be untrue.

Response: About 80% of the quotes in the "Talmud Unmasked" are from books that, while important Jewish books, are not actually the Talmud which is made up only of the "Mishnah" and the "Gomorrah." I know this because Pranaitis does an excellent job of documenting his sources in the appendix.

Although he confirms quotations from what he claims are books not part of the Talmud, he omitted refering to the other 'twenty-percent' that he evidently accepts as being from the Talmud. That hadn't occurred to me until now. While he verifies the authenticity of Fr. Pranaitis' information, he claims that only the Mishnah and the Gomorrah make up the Talmud. That would omit the Torah, the Sanhedrin, the Midrash, and a few dozen other volumes included in the sixty-three volume set of books referred to as the "Talmud".

Rabbi Jacob Neusner explains it otherwise, in his Rabbinic Judaism. While not citing specific books, he expounds on the depth and breadth of the Talmud.

"That sustained, systematic exposition, through one instance after another, of the right reading of the Torah in both its media comes to Israel [Jews] now as in the past in a single document, The Talmud of Babylonia.

That statement of fact describes the centrality of Talmud in the future curriculum of the Judaic intellect, the priority of the Talmud from the time of its closure in about 600 C.E. to the present time.

For 'Judaism' is Rabbinic Judaism, and the Talmud of Babylonia is the authoritative statement of the Torah that Judaism embodies.

The Talmud is the prism, receiving, refracting all light.

To state the proposition in academic language: into that writing all prior canonical writings emerged; to it, all appeal is directed; upon it, all conclusions ultimately rest. In the language of Torah itself: study of the Torah begins, as a matter of simple, ubiquitous fact, in the Talmud . . .

In all times, places, and writings, other than those rejected as heretical, from then to now, the Talmud formed the starting point and the ending point, the alpha and the omega of truth; . . .

In reading the written Torah itself, the Talmud's exegesis enjoys priority of place. Scripture rightly read reaches Israel in the Talmud (and related writings of Midrash); sound exegesis conforms to the facts of the Talmud. . .

In all decisions of law that express theology in everyday action, the Talmud forms the final statement of the torah, mediating Scripture's rules. Innovation of every kind, whether in the character of the spiritual life or in the practice of the faith in accord with its norms, must find justification in the Talmud. "(p.205)

"That is the power of this Judaism, which for as long time, and for the majority of practitioners of Rabbinic Judaism today, defines the normative, the classical, the authentic Torah: Rabbinic Judaism.

That formulation of the theology of Rabbinic Judaism, which is to say, of the Torah, therefore constitutes the Talmud's representation of the Torah. . . to know the Torah, we have to think in the way in which Torah teaches us to think. No prior document spells out that way, in massive, tedious, repetitive detail, case by case by case, as does the Talmud of Babylonia." (p209)

Those excerpts were taken from Judaism's Strange Gods, by Michael A. Hoffman II. Let us now read a brief sampling of the books of the Talmud, from Fr. Pranaitis' book, which authenticity has been verified by a Zionist Jew. We will begin with Fr. Pranaitis' explanation of the various terms used for Goi (non-Jews), specifically Christians: (Brackets and parentheses are part of the original transcript. Emphasis added is in bold font.)

"As in our languages Christians take their name from Christ, so in the language of the Talmud Christians are called Notsrim, from Jesus the Nazarene. But Christians are also called by the names used in the Talmud to designate all non-Jews:

Abhodah Zarah -- strange worship, idolatry;

Akum -- made up of the initial letters of the words Obhde Kokhabkim U Mazzaloth - worshippers of stars and planets;

Obhde Elilim -- servers of idols;

Minim -- heretics;

Nokhrim -- strangers, foreigners;

Edom -- Edomites 'they are called Edomites who move their fingers 'here and here' (making the sign of the cross);

Amme Haarets -- people of the earth, idiots;

Goi -- Race, or people; a gentile; they call a gentile woman a Goiah. It is mostly applied to non-Jews or idolaters. In Jewish books which treat of Idolatry, worshippers of idols are often called by this single world Goi. For this reason, in more recent editions of the Talmud the use of the word Goi is purposely avoided and other words for non-Jews are substituted;

Apikorosim -- Epicureans. All are called by this name who do not observe God's precepts, as well as all those, even Jews themselves, who express private judgments in matters of faith. How much more, therefore "Christians";

Kuthrim -- Samaritans. But since there are no longer any Samaritans, and since there are many references in recent Jewish books to Samaritans, who can doubt that this does not mean the Christians?

Christians are unclean. The following is given in Biur Hetib, a commentary on the Schulchan Arukh:

"A woman must wash herself again if she sees any unclean thing, such as a dog, an ass, or People of the Earth; a Christian (Akum) a camel, a pig, a horse, and a leper."

In Abhodah Zarah, (22b):

"Why are the Goyim unclean? Because they were not present at Mount Sinai. For when the serpent entered into Eve he infused her with uncleanness. But the Jews were cleansed from this when they stood on Mount Sinai; the Goyim, however, who were not on Mount Sinai were not cleansed."

By their own admission, at least 95% of the Jews today are of Khazarian ancestry. It is doubtful that the descendants of today's Jews 'were present at Mount Sinai'. Not only is the religion itself a creation of the Pharisees and Rabbis, it appears the people of the religion are nearly non-existent. What comes to mind is the statement of Moses Mendelssohn, that Judaism is not a religion, it is a law religionized. Back to Father Pranaitis:

Not like men, but beasts. In Kerithuth (6b p.78) it says:

"The teaching of the Rabbis is: He who pours oil over a Goi, and over dead bodies is freed from punishment. This is true for an animal because it is not a man. But how can it be said that by pouring oil over a Goi one is freed from punishment, since a Goi is also a man? But this is not true, for it is written: Ye are my flock, the flock of my pasture are men. (Ezechiel, XXXIV, 31) You are thus called men, but the Goyim are not called men."

They differ only in form from beasts. Midrasch Talpioth (fol. 225d):

"God created them in the form of men for the glory of Israel. But Akum were created for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jews] day and night. Nor can they ever be relieved from this service. It is becoming to the son of a king [an Israelite] that animals in their natural form, and animals in the form of human beings should minister unto him."

Rabbi Edels, in commenting on Kethuboth (110b) says:

"The Psalmist compares the Akum to the unclean beast in the woods."

Worse Than Animals. Rabbi Schelomo Iarchi (Raschi), famous Jewish commentator, explaining the law of Moses (Deuter. XIV, 21) forbidding the eating of meat of wounded animals, but which must be given to the ‘stranger in thy gates,’ or which, according to Exodus (XXII, 30) is to be thrown to the dogs, has this to say:

".... for he is like a dog. Are we to take the word ‘dog’ here literally? By no means. For the text in speaking of dead bodies says, Or thou mayest sell it to an alien. This applies much more to the meat of wounded animals, for which it is permitted to accept payment. Why therefore does the Scripture say it may be thrown to ‘dogs’? In order to teach you that a dog is to be more respected than the Nokhri."

They propagate like beasts. Sanhedrin (74b) Tosephoth:

"The sexual intercourse of a Goi is like to that of a beast."

Kethuboth (3b):

"The seed of a Goi is worth the same as that of a beast."

Zohar (II, 64b): Rabbi Abba says:

"If only idolaters alone had sexual intercourse, the world would not continue to exist. Hence we are taught that a Jew should not give way to those infamous robbers. For if these propagate in greater number, it will be impossible for us to continue to exist because of them. For they give birth to sucklings the same as dogs."

Although the first five books of the Christian Bible, (O.T.) is the foundation of the Talmud, and lovingly embraced by Christians, here's what the Talmud says of the Gospels:

"Minim -- Heretics. In the Talmud those who possess books called the Gospels are heretics. 'Siphre Debeth Abidan', Books of the House of Perdition. The Talmud in particular speaks of the books of the Gospels. Thus in Schabbath (116a) it says:

"Rabbi Meir calls heretical books 'Aven Gilaion', (volumes of iniquity) because they call them Gospels."

A Jew is forbidden not only to enter a Christian church, but even to go near it, except under certain circumstances. In Iore Dea (142,10) it says:

"It is forbidden to stand in the shadow of a house of idolatry, whether from the inside or the outside, for a distance of four cubits from the front door...

Christians are to be avoided because they are Idolaters. Lest a Jew be the occasion, of sin to the idolatrous Christians . . . In Abhodah Zarah (2a) it says:

"For three days before their idolatrous festivals it is not permitted to buy or sell them anything. It is also forbidden to give or take any help from them, to change any money with them, to pay them back any debts or allow them to pay back debts."

In the Abhodah Zarah, (78c - the Perusch of Maimonides, fol. it says:

"All the festivals of the followers of Jesus are forbidden, and we must conduct ourselves towards them as we would towards idolaters."

Mention is also made of many other things which it is forbidden to sell to Christians, such as: cloth from which priestly vestments and banners may be made; paper and ink which may be used for writing books pertaining to their divine worship. Nowadays, however, Jews trade with Christians, especially on Christian feast days. . . The Talmud can give no reason for this, and in the Abhodah Zarah (2a, Toseph) it says:

"It is difficult to say by what right Jews nowadays trade with the Goyim on their feast days. . . yet every week they celebrate the Day of the Nazarene which has always been forbidden to us."

Bartenora, however, in his commentary on Abhodah Zarah (1,2, fol. 7b) says:

"Since, while we are in captivity we cannot live without trading with them, and we depend upon them for our food and we must fear them, it is only forbidden to trade with them on their feast days. Furthermore, it is permitted nowadays to trade with them even on the actual day of their feasts, because the Rabbis are convinced that they do not worship their idols just because they trade with us. And what is forbidden in this book must be taken as applying directly to idolatry."

A Jew must not go before a Christian Judge. In Choschen Hammischpat (26,1) it says:

"A Jew is not permitted to bring his case before Akum judges, even if the matter is judged by the decisions of Jewish [Talmudic] law, and even if both parties agree to abide by such decisions. He who does so is impious and similar to one who calumniates and blasphemes, and who raises his hand against the Law given us by Moses, our great law-giver."

Since the Goyim minister to Jews like beasts of burden, they belong to a Jew together with his life and all his faculties. From A. Rohl. Die Polem. p.20:

"The life of a Goi and all his physical powers belong to a Jew."

A Jew must always try to deceive Christians. In Zohar (1, 160a) it says:

"Rabbi Jehuda said to him [Rabbi Chezkia]: 'He is to be praised who is able to free himself from the enemies of Israel, and the just are much to be praised who get free from them and fight against them'.

Rabbi Chezkia asked, 'How must we fight against them?'

Rabbi Jehuda said, 'By wise counsel thou shalt war against them' (Proverbs: 24; 6).

By what kind of war? The kind of war that every son of man must fight against his enemies, which Jacob used against Esau -- by deceit and trickery whenever possible. They must be fought against without ceasing, until proper order be restored. Thus it is with satisfaction that I say we should free ourselves from them and rule over them."

In Abhodah Zarah (26b, Tosephoth) it says:

"Even the best of the Goyim should be killed."

The Schulchan Arukh, after the words of Iore Dea (158,1), that those of the Akum who do no harm to Jews are not to be killed, namely those who do not wage war against Israel, thus explains the word Milchamah -- war.

"But in time of war the Akum are to be killed, for it is written: The good among the Akum deserve to be killed, etc.' "

Another book that quotes extensively from the Talmud is, ISRAEL - Our Duty - Our Dilemma. The author of this book, Theodore Winston Pike, appears to be a Judeo-Christian.

While he vehemently opposes Zionism, he embraces Judaism of the Bible, quotes heavily from the Talmud, and attempts to separate the two. There is no separation. There can be no separation, because Judaism of the Bible - the first five books of the Old Testament - are the Talmud exemplified. More than that, they are the very foundation of the Talmud, being the Torah.

After spending a few hours reading parts of the book that had earlier been skipped over (from frustration at the mixed message), it was apparent the book contains valuable information. Maybe it is that half-way house between sleeping and awakening.

The author gives his readers a clear picture of the evils of the Zionist plan for World Dominion, reinforcing much of what we have written here. To make his point, he quotes heavily from the Talmud, Kabalah, and Jewish Encyclopedias. He factually portrays the dangers of a planned world takeover by the Zionists, and the perversion and destruction that has resulted from Israel's power today - especially their hold over the U.S. government.

This is all steeped in Old Testament and Pauline scripture, and through it all he maintains that "for the present, while on the international level America must respect diplomatic and geopolitical realities concerning the state of Israel" . He believes that America must, because it's written in the Old Testament.

In addition he says that 'Christians must remain alive to the humanitarian and spiritual needs of Jews', however, the duty does not include active support of the Antichrist system in the Middle East.

He mentions the O.T. prophecies that claimed one day a holy remnant will be led back to Palestine by God, and all Jewry would live there as evangelists to the nations and "servants of the King of Zion".

Mr. Pike has evidently not read the Protocols, that boast of their 'King Despot of the Blood of Zion' that they're preparing for the world. He obviously believes the King of Zion will be Jesus, who said clearly that his kingdom is not of this world.

Admitting that most of the inhabitants of Israel today are not descendants from either Abraham or that 'Holy Land' which they occupy, but are instead of the Khazarian ancestry, he insists that:

"God's spiritual covenant with the ancient patriarchs is still alive in spirit -- still as binding as when God first told Abraham that He would one day save His children."

That is the insanity - double-mindedness - that exists where religious indoctrination takes over. Even though Israel today is evil, we must support it because it was mandated by 'God'. The 'God' that made that covenant with Abraham was Jehovah, the tribal deity fabricated by the Pharisees.

This type of confusion is a result of the mental programming of religious training. It is unfortunate, because if it weren't for the completely scrambled message, Pike's book could have been a wake-up call for many Judeo-Christians, and possibly the Jews themselves.

While reading the quotes from the Talmud relevant to sex and sexual perversion, thoughts of the perversion being promulgated in America today - too many examples to relate in detail here - flooded my mind. It is everywhere: on television programs that youngsters watch, HBO presentations so ghastly that five seconds of viewing leaves one wondering what planet he is on, movies, books, videos, stage plays, and even in what is called 'the arts' today.

Parents who closely monitor their children's entertainment in an effort to protect their innocent and very open minds, and whose children are still in the government indoctrination centers are sending them into the arms of the purveyors of perversion.  

Schools are teaching that homosexuality is a normal, natural way to be, and opening their minds to perversions such as bestiality, 'fisting', etc. In Massachusetts special sessions were presented by homosexuals inducing the children from ages twelve to sixteen to 'try it; you might like it'.

As reported in the Washington Times, at a recent United Nations Child Summit, a UNICEF-funded book was given to delegates from Latin America encouraging children to engage in sexual activities with other minors, homosexuals and animals. The book, which was distributed by the Mexican government with U.N. funding, suggests lesbian sex as an acceptable alternative for girls as a way to avoid pregnancy. A brief excerpt of the book says it best:

"Sexual relations with a partner: Here we should insist there is no ideal or perfect relations between two or several people. . . . the one that gives us the most satisfaction and that which is adopted to our way of being and the style of life we have chosen. This is why we encounter many differences among women. Some women like to have relations with men. And others with another woman."

An accompanying workshop book produced by the U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) tells Latin American mothers and teens:

"Situations in which you can obtain sexual pleasure: 1) Masturbation. 2) Sexual relations with a partner - whether heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual. 3) A sexual response that is directed toward inanimate objects, animals, minors, non-consenting persons."

If sex with a non-consenting person isn't rape, all the dictionaries must be rewritten. In fact, they are being rewritten slowly and surely year by year. The Webster's 21st Century 'for school, home and office', 1993 edition has omitted the word 'pederasty', which - for our reader who may be as naive as I in having to look up the definition - means, "practicing anal intercourse, especially with a boy". It was found in a 1960's edition.

If the content of this section seems too 'sensitive' a subject for our reader, know that our once-innocent children are being bombarded with this same type of 'content' wherever they turn, and is acceptable by Talmudic standards, along with bestiality.

Now, having read that, when you read the quotations on sex and sexual perversion from the Talmud, bear in mind that the United Nations was first called the League of Nations, and recall the boast from Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow, at the Carlsbad Congress on 8-24-1922 that:

"The League of Nations is a Jewish idea. We created it after a fight of 25 years".

We will end this section with a relevant excerpt from Protocol No.9:

"In order not to annihilate the institutions of the goyim before it is time we have touched them with craft and delicacy, and have taken hold of the ends of the springs which move their mechanism. These springs lay in a strict but just sense of order; we have replaced them by the chaotic license of liberalism.

We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the corner-stones of a free existence.

We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated."

With that said, we will begin quoting from the Talmud on sex and sexual perversion that will allow us a look into the future, at the world in the New World Order, IF the Zionists succeed in their plan. Sadly, it really isn't 'into the future', for we are experiencing it now. Before you move on, you might want to read the Protocols one more time. It was all laid out very clearly a hundred years ago, wasn't it?