Protocolz Menu
|
WHEN VICTIMS
RULE,
A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America
Source: JTR
Website
"American Jews have
made tremendous contributions
in all aspects of
general culture. In
the professions, in
music, in ltierature,
in painting and
sculpture, in the
academic world, and
in the area of science,
Jews are
often distinguished
and in many instances
pre-eminent."
-- Milton Plesur,
1982, p. 168-169
Jews are dominant
in virtually all controlling
facets of the modern
art world. In the world
of "high-culture" dance,
music, and theatre,
for decades S. Hurok Productions was the major
force in performance
promotion. When Sol
Hurok (born Solomon
Izrailevich Gurkov)
died in 1974, notes
Harlan Robinson, "he
was the last large-scale
independent commercial
producer of high culture
in the United States
...
[ROBINSON, p.
xv]
... [He] was
an important force behind
the establishment of
the National Endowment
for the Arts." [ROBINSON,
p. xiv] An early Hurok
partner was Jacob
Berman. [ROBINSON,
H., 1994, p. 120] An
early competitor in
the "concert management
business" was Daniel
Mayer's and Marks
Levine's National
Broadcasting and Concert
Bureau, with links
to the fledgling NBC
broadcast network. [ROBINSON,
H., 1994, p. 133] In
1972 Hurok's head of
publicity, Martin
Feinstein, became
the Executive Director
of Performing Arts for
the newly created John
F. Kennedy Center in
Washington DC. (Hurok's
son-in-law, Barry
Hyams, originally
hired Feinstein to the
Hurok firm. [ROBINSON,
H., 1994, p. 298] In
1975, the president
of Hurok Concerts, Sheldon
Gold, was replaced
by Maynard Goldman.
Gold became president
later of the major talent
agency ICM Artists Ltd., a newly formed classical
music and dance division
of Marvin Josephson Associates.
In
assessment of Hurok's
closest associates,
Harlan Robinson notes
that "beyond his domestic
employees [cook, servant],
Hurok had not real close
friends, with the possible
exception of [Jewish
violinist Isaac]
Stern. The violinist
was also a favorite
with Peter Hyams
and Peter's sister
Nessa. They also
remember their grandfather
had a group of 'cronies,'
including some Russian
Jews, whom he had known
for years and to whom
he remained steadfastly
loyal. These included
his accountant and his
longtime lawyer, Elias
Lieberman, an old-time
socialist who had helped
to found the International
Ladies Garment Workers
Union" [ROBINSON, H.,
1994, p. 405] At
Hurok's death, he "left
money to his grandchildren
and to a variety of
Jewish charitable organizations
... Surprisingly, only
one performing arts
organization was included
in Hurok's will: the
Musicians' Emergency
Fund, Inc." [ROBINSON,
H. 1994, p. 462]
Hurok
was even succesful in
getting a Hollywood
movie made about his
life (screenplay writers:
Harry Kurnitz and
George Oppenheimer;
producer: Georgie
Jessel). [ROBINSON,
H., 1994, p. 320] "Highest
on the list of Hurok's
demands [for the movie]
was the removal of any
Jewish ethnicity in
the character of the
impressario hero or
his associates ...[ROBINSON,
H., 1994, p. 321] ...
Similarly, Hurok strongly
objected to the presence
of 'the stock figures
of cigar-smoking impresarios'
present in the script's
original opening sequence.
Such images would, he
feared, detract from
the image of refinement
and good taste he wanted
his fictionalized self
to convey ... [He did
not want to appear as]
some sort of back-room
shyster." [ROBINSON,
H., 1994, p. 322] In
the mainstream, the
resultant film was not
widely acclaimed. The
Jewish Ledger
declared, however, that
"Jews in America will
be proud of the film
... Himself a very modest
person, Mr. Hurok is
very much interested
in everything that is
Jewish and lends a helping
hand in Jewish affairs."
[ROBINSON, H., 1994,
p. 332]
In the world of theatre,
notes Lester Friedman,
"by the early 1890s
a good deal of the theatrical
booking business in
New York City was in
Jewish hands, thanks
to the Klaw &
Erlanger syndicate,
the Shubert brothers,
Marcus Loew and
Adolph Zukor,
the Schenck brothers,
and a host of other
agents and stage managers."
[FRIEDMAN, L., 1982,
p. 9]
Likewise, for decades
the most prominent mogul
on Broadway was a Jewish
producer, David Merrick
(born David Margulies).
Merrick's abusive personality
saddled him with a widely
known nickname: "the
abominable showman."
Another Jewish theatre
mogul, Joseph Papp
(Papirofsky), founded
the New York Shakespeare
Festival, created the
influential Public Theatre
for playwrights, and
produced such Broadway
hits as Hair
and A Chorus Line.
Papp's "ego was huge,"
says Jewish author Helen
Epstein,
"but instead of slickness,
he exuded reserve and
a sobriety that made
me think
of Old Testament patriarchs
... Papp had influenced
a huge number of his
contemporaries and younger
people in the arts.
Hundreds of writers,
actors,
directors, composers,
dessigners, producers,
arts administrators,
stage managers, journalists
and critics traced the
beginnings of their
careers to the [Shakespeare]
Festival. Thousands
more dated thier first
exposure to Shakespeare
to a production
in Central Park. Millions
of others had seen yhis
productions on television
and on
Broadway. The name Joseph
Papp embodied the history
and very best possibilities
of New York." [EPSTEIN,
H., 1994, p. 10-ll]
Oscar
Hammerstein I, also
Jewish, by the early
years of the 20th century
built thirteen theatres/music
hall (often for the
opera) in New York,
Philadelphia, and London.
"The name and personality
of Oscar Hammerstein,"
notes Vincent Sheean,
"became as familiar
to the nation as if
he had been elected
its President ... Oscar
Hammerstein ... commanded
more space in the press
than the Vanderbilts,
Astors, Morgans, than
William Jennings Bryan
or indeed any other
personage of his day
except President Theodore
Roosevelt." [SHEEAN,
V., 1956, p. 3-4] Hammerstein
(and son Willie)
even owned the Victoria
Theatre ("the great
nut vaudeville house
of New York") which
was famed for freak
shows, featuring "persons
notorious for whatever
reason" -- "bridge jumpers
and stunt flyers, divorcees,
channel swimmers, and
record-breakers of any
kind; whether they had
stage talent was irrelevant."
[SHEEAN, 1956, p. 112]
Hammerstein's greatest
rival in the opera world
(who eventually bought
him out) was also Jewish,
Otto Kahn, "banker
and connoisseur of the
arts [and] principal
financial power of the
Metropolitan [Opera
Company]." [SHEEAN,
V., 1956, p. 296]
But
the most powerful entrepreneurial
network in theatre production
and control has long
been the Shubert
company. Jerry Stagg
notes that Samuel,
Jacob, and Lee
(Levi) Shubert
"invaded New York City
in 1900, armed with
tireless energy, boundless
confidence, a lust for
money, power, and fame,
and $15,000, most of
it borrowed. A quarter
of a center later, their
worth was estimated
at half a billion dollars.
[The Shuberts] took
control of theatre in
America." [STAGG, p.
3] (Shubert CEO in the
year 2000? Gerald
Schoenfeld). More
at ground level, Lee
Strasberg and Stella
Adler of New York's
Group Theatre were legendary
and profoundly influential
acting teachers. Lawrence
Langner was one
of the founders of the
Washington Square Players.
As
Ellen Schiff notes:
"A
few years ago, Tyrone
Guthrie speculated that
if Jews withdrew from
the
American
theatre, the institution
'would collapse about
next Thursday.'
Guthrie
was no doubt assessing
Jewish contributions
at every level of
of
show business from artistic,
to administrators, to
'angels.' [i.e,
philanthropists]."
[SCHIFF, E., 1986, p.
79]
By 1999, Jewish entrepreneur
Robert F.X. Sillerman's
SFX company was causing shock waves
in the live theatre
and music promotion
worlds. In one and a
half years it had spent
$1.5 billion in gobbling
up other companies.
The Financial Post
noted that he was still
attempting to "strengthen
his domination of live
theatre promotion in
the United States. SFX also is the single largest player
in [music] concert promotion.
So large, in fact, that
regulators expressed
concern last year ...
SFX
is now believed to be
close to purchasing
its only major rival,
Universal Concerts, a division of Montreal
firm Seagram
Company [controlled
by the Jewish Bronfman
family]." [LANG, A.,
5-28-99, p. C1, C17]
SFX also owns or operates over 80 venues
in the United States,
mostly concert halls,
as well as the rights
to many theatrical productions
(Phantom of the Opera,
et al). It also produces
over 13,000 events a
year. Its recently purchased
Falk Associated Management Enterprises
division manages 650
professional athletes
and broadcasters --
basketball star Michael
Jordan among them. "Talent
agencies, ticketing
companies, and independent
promoters," notes the
(New York) Daily
News, "have complained
that the new live entertainment
giant exerts too much
control over the industry."
[FURMAN, 6-7-99, p.
57] In August 1999 SFX moved into Great Britain too, purchasing
the Apollo
Leisure Group (one of the largest theatre
and arena operators
in that country) for
$254 million. The purchase
also included Tickets
Direct and the Barry
Claymore Corporation.
[FARMER, N., 8-21-99,
p. 13]
In the dance world,
Martha Graham was one
of the icons of this
art form in the 20th
century. She wasn't
Jewish. But in her early
seventies her "right
hand man" became Ron
Protas, Jewish and
in his twenties, who
eventually positioned
himself to inherit her
entire estate at her
death. As Ismene Brown
notes
"When dance great
Martha Graham died at
the age of 96, she left
him
[Protas] everything.
It was the greatest
legacy to dance this
century.
Five years later
Ron Protas stood
as the only inheritor
of the Graham
works, the Graham
company, and the Graham
industry. After reading
the section
on Protas in the huge
biography of Graham
by her long-term
colleague and
fellow choreographer
Agnes de Mille (Rodeo,
Oklahoma!);
it's hard not
to expect to meet Svengali,
Mephistopholes, and
a leech
rolled into
one. No one could have
been more damned in
print. He
caused a 'blood-letting,'
'policed' Graham, de
Mille says; turned her
against old
friends, made her into
an elderly fool performing
into
her seventies,
and tainted a monumental
career with sleazy celebrity
games. The object
of this scorn (shared
by many) is a shock
to meet --
an amiably shambling,
hunched-up man of 49,
black curly hair,
chubby Jewish
features, constantly
wreathed in smiles,
very disarming."
[BROWN, I.,
10-16-96, p. 17]
Famed
dancer Isadora Duncan's
accompaniest was Max
Rabinovitch. [ROBINSON,
H., 1994, p. 91] Duncan's
husband, Russian poet
Seregei Yesenin, was
once publicized as an
"anti-Semite." "Not
surprisingly," notes
Harlow Robinson, "and
probably with [Jewish
impresario Sol]
Hurok's help,
the story of Yesenin's
anti-Semitism immediately
hit the newspapers,
elaborately embroidered."
[ROBINSON, M., 1994,
p. 92] As Julia Foulkes
declares about the Jewish
angle to the modern
dance world:
"Although
the leaders of modern
dance in the 1930s --
Martha Graham, Doris
Humphrey,
Chalres Weidman, and
Haya Holm -- were not
Jewish, Jewish
women
filled modern dance
classes, companies,
organizations, picket
lines,
and
concert audiences. Teachers,
such as Blanche Talmud
and Edith Segal,
taught
performers, such as
Lily Mehlman and Lillian
Shapero; performances
by
choreographers such
as Anna Sokolow and
Sophie Maslow, were
reviewed
by
critics, such as Edna
Ocko; while organizers,
such as Helen Tamiris
and
Fanya
Geltman, hassled labor
unions and the federal
government for increased
attention
to dance. These efforts
in substantiating a
new art form have been
overlooked
because our view of
the arts tends to focus
on a few stars,
emphasizing
individual genius rather
than collective momentum
and organizational
drive.
Jewish women shaped
the foundation of modern
dance, and in the mid-
1930s
their impact was well
enough known that the
eminent social commentator
[and
Jewish comedian] Fanny
Brice could unleash
her satire on the subject,
playing
Martha Graham in a sketch
entitled 'Modernistic
Moe,' in which she
cried 'Rewolt!' in a
Yiddish accent." [FOULKES,
J., JUNE 2000, p. 233-252]
Even the best known
mime in history, Marcel
Marceau (originally
Mangel), is Jewish.
To his credit, he once
told a Jewish ethnic
newspaper: "I find it
hard to identify with
Jewish issues -- humanity
is my overriding battle
cry." [JOSEPHS, J.,
3-30-01] Performer Meredith
Monk is also Jewish.
[TWICE BLESSED, online
gay/Jewish website]
Jewish influence
in the visual arts is
a huge story. "Modern
art" (hereafter defined
as painting, sculpture,
and other visual arts)
in capitalist society
is a paradox. Its practitioners
generally believe that
their personal expressions
of the human experience
through physical objects
are secularly sacred.
Yet, to survive and
prosper as artists,
to garner the support
to do further work that
transcends mere consumerism,
this belief itself must
be fundamentally prostituted.
"Fine art," notes anthropologist
Stuart Plattner, "is
similar to religion
... as an institution
that counteracts the
crassly commercial search
for advancement in a
capitalist art world.
At the same time, these
objects of supposedly
sublime vision are bought
and sold as commodities."
[PLATTNER, p. 4]
The elitist "art world"
strata -- so-called
"High Art"-- is the
milieu of painting provenances,
artist pedigrees, and
the changing "avante-garde"
superstar brand-names.
There are, strangely,
no objective standards
in this strata to discern
quality or value in
either the artist or
his creations. Not only
are there no clear standards
of evaluation, "in the
age of conceptual, minimal,
and performance art,
it is often unclear
what museum quality
art is supposed to look
like." [PLATTNER, p.
5] The confirmation
of artistic importance
(and, hence, quality
and value) is merely
the decision of the
"informed opinion" of
High Art insiders, whose
dictates are often self-rewarding.
Such insiders include
an incestuous cabal
of professional art
curators, critics, and
dealers who swim back
and forth among these
occupational categories
of art trade. (There
are other entrees to
the art community, of
course. One of the most
prominent art critics
of the 1960s and 1970s
was Harold Rosenberg
who was trained
as a lawyer and who
became an influential
"art critic" after a
career in advertising.
[JACOBY, p. 110]
As Rosenberg himself
once noted, "Since the
rise of art history,
in the nineteenth century,
art historians have
been directly linked
with the market prices
of paintings and sculptures
because of their authority
in deciding attributions.
By the 1970s, art history,
having achieved the
leading role in the
day-to-day life of art,
had overgrown all its
theoretical boundaries
and gone to seed; it
was now prepared to
put the stamp of value
on anything, not excluding
publicized fakes." [MEYER,
K., 1979, p. 186]
While there
is no clearly unifying
and objective standard
of art evaluation, there
is a referential High
Art history, the entwined
tales of artists and
wealthy business patrons
who brought them to
public attention and
acclaim. There is also
an art jargon, and meta-language
"art talk" for those
in the know.
As
Duncan Cameron, once-director
of the Brooklyn Museum,
said in a speech to
the United Nations:
"In
summary, then, the traditional
museum has been administered
by a curatorial
elite
whose members are trained
as scholars in disciplines
relevant to the museum
collections
... structured according
to specific models of
knowledge. These
models
are generally incomprehensible
to other than those
trained in a
specific
discipline and may be
said to be encoded in
the private languages
of
scholarship ... This
situation has persisted
through the reluctance
of the
public
to protest it and the
willingness of governing
bodies to support it.
Both
have been in awe of
the mystique of curatorship,
both have been
unprepared
to admit that the content
of the museum is meanignless
and lacks
a
personal relevance ...
For a few, the upper-middle
class with higher
education
and therefore some key
to the secret codes,
it becomes a
domain
with class and status
connections." [MEYER,
K., 1979, p. 236-237]
"Art has
become a commodity,"
notes Sophy Burnham,
"Collectors bought art
as profitable speculation.
Museums bought what
their trustees (these
same collectors) demanded
they immortalize. Critics
pushed art in which
they had financial interest
... The artist had no
part in these exchanges.
Once his work passed
out of his hands ...
he received no further
royalties. He watched
the prices rise and
the dealers in art get
fat ... Art was whatever
would sell." [BURNHAM,
p. 9]
"On the assumption
that "he who pays the
piper calls the tunes,"
says Judith Huggins-Balfe,
"critics have accused
both individuals and
institutional private
patrons of altering
some presumably 'natural'
development of art,
in their own class and
commercial interests."
[BALFE, p. 314] Si
Newhouse, for instance,
(whom we have met before
as chairman of the huge
Advance media chain),"
said dealer Leo Castelli,
"is one who has put
together a perfect choice
of artists, starting
out with Pollack and
de Kooning." [WATSON,
p. 104]
While trained
"art professionals"
are influential, the
foundation of the modern
art world is those who
buy and sell it (sometimes
these very art professionals).
Such people decide what
has value, and even
what art is and is not.
Most do not truly care
about cutting edge perceptual
insights or transcendent
visions but, rather,
money. Most buying and
selling of art today,
especially in the realm
of High Art, is an economic
investment. In 1984
major art journals,
including ArtNews
and Art and Antiques,
even began publishing
lists of major art collectors.
60% of the list were
Americans. The next
most populous were Japanese,
then Germans. [WATSON,
p. 388] (In more recent
years, with Japanese
economic woes, Japanese
influence has correspondingly
diminished and a significant
percentage of today's
"German" art activity
we can safely presume
to be Jewish).
The heart of the American
(and international)
High Art market is New
York City. "Although
Los Angeles, Chicago,
San Francisco, Santa
Fe, and other centers
have large demands [for
art]," says Stuart Plattner,
"New York is hegemonic
on the national scale,
and even the international
level, meaning that
only elite gallery exposure
in New York creates
art-historical significance."
[PLATTNER, p. 8] New
York City is also home
for the most important
art magazines and other
periodicals whose sphere
of reportage is usually
its immediate vicinity.
By 1973, some estimated
that 75-80% of the 2500
core "art market' personnel
-- art dealers, art
curators, art critics,
and art collectors --
were Jewish. [BURNHAM,
p. 25] These people
-- and their progeny
-- in New York largely
control American artistic
tastes and values at
the most important tier.
(In 2001, according
to ARTnews, at
least eight of the "Top
Ten" art collectors
were Jewish: Debbie
and Leon Black,
Edythe and Eli Broad,
Doris and Donald
Fisher, Ronnie and
Samuel Heyman,
Marie-Josee and Henry
R. Kravitz, Evelyn
and Leonard Lauder,
Jo Carole and Ronald
S. Lauder, and Stephen
Wynn). [ESTEROW,
M., SUMMER 2001]
When Alice Bellony-Rewald
(an artist, critic,
and art model) first
moved into the New York
art world from France,
she noted that :
"I was
plunged into a world
of highly sophisticated
Jewish art collectors,
and it
took me a long time
to reconcile my mental
picture of speakeasies
and the
Wild West with people
who spoke five languages
fluently and
lived
surrounded by period
furniture, Meissen china,
and Old
Masters."
[PEPPIATT, p. 16]
Jewish author Howard
Jacobson wrote in
1993 about his experiences
with prominent New York
City art critic Peter
Schjeldhal:
"'I came to New York
to be Jewish,' [Schjeldhal]
once told me.
'Porcelain-sink
Lutheran.'
'And now?
Since you haven't made
it across as one of
us?'
He paused.
He wasn't sure he wanted
to be that un-Jewish.
'A certain
transformation has occurred;
but a certain gulf
It takes
me a little while to
put it together -- the
fact that just about
every
gallery/space/loft we
go into is run by a
Jew. This isn't Jewish
how I
like it. This is slow-drawl,
camp Jewish, retreating,
high-toned,
not very
sense-of-humorish Jewish.
The pallid women gallery-owners
whose walls
and wine we absorb are
also Jewish." [JACOBSON,
H.,
1995, p. 84-85]
Famous Jewish novelist
Judith Krantz
notes in her biography
her avenue into the
upper tiers of the art
world: "Polly Guggenheim,
a sculptor who'd lived
in Paris most of her
life, became our guide
into the art world."
[KRANTZ, J., 2000, p.
324]
In 1996, Jewish
art historian Eunice
Lipton admitted
that the main reason
she went into a career
as an art historian
was to be in a field
dominated by Jews:
"I wanted
to be where Jews were
-- that is, I wanted
a profession that
would
allow me tacitly to
acknowledge my Jewishness
through the
| | |