Home
When Victims Rule (A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America)
Protocolz Menu


WEB TRANSLATION

Print this page
Text Size:
Smaller Text Larger Text
Default

WHEN VICTIMS RULE,
A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America
Source: JTR Website



27.
ISRAEL AND ZIO
NISM


 

"Israel's claim to the Holy Land rests on the existence of God. If

it was not God's will that they possessed Canaan, the nations

can reproach them as mere conquering brigands."

Herman Wouk, Jewish novelist, p. 186

                  

"Is Zionism racism? I would say yes. It's a policy that to me

looks like it has very many parallels with racism. The effect is

the same. Whether you call it that or not is in a sense

irrelevant."   
 
       Desmund Tutu, South African Archbishop and activist
against apartheid,
[in HOFFMAN, p. 15]


"Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life.
Thus people haunted by the purposelessness of their lives to try
to find a new content not only by dedicating themselves to a holy
cause but also by nursing a fanatical grievance."
Eric Hoffer, The True Believer, 1963, p. 102

 



"Zionism ... must after Auschwitz be a Christian commitment
as well
[as a Jewish one] ... The post-Holocaust Christian must repent of the
Christian sin of suppressionism ... Without Zionism, Christian as well
as Jewish, the Holy Spirit cannot
dwell between Jews and Christians in dialogue ... Christians after the Holocaust, we have seen, must be
Zionists on behalf
not only of Jews but also of Christianity itself."

Emil Fackenheim, Jewish author, p. 285, 305

 

"If power corrupts, the reverse is also true; persecution corrupts
the victims though perhaps in subtler and more tragic ways."

Arthur Koestler, [in GILMAN, p. 33]

 

"Is there anything more common than the transformation of

persecuted into persecutor ... ?

Maxime Rodinson, p. 9

 

"In the twentieth century, men -- all of us -- find themselves

compelled to commit or condone evil for the sake of preventing

an evil believed to be greater. And the tragedy is that we do not

know whether the evil we condone will not in the end be greater

than the evil we seek to avert-- or be identified with."

Emil Fackenheim,  [in BELL, p. 317]

 

"If Israelis know about oppression, it is mostly from the

oppressor’s end of the gun sight."

Benjamin Beit Hallahmi,  Israeli

professor at Haifa University

 

              "One of the major problems with Israeli democracy is that it has

              no constitutional guarantees of human rights. To my knowledge

              it's the only functioning democracy without such provision."

                                                 Asa Kasher, Israeli philosopher,

                                                 [in BRANDT, J., 2000, p. 10]

     "Israel is working on a biological weapon that would harm Arabs but not Jews,
      according to Israeli military and western intelligence sources ... In developing their       "ethno-bomb," Israeli scientists are trying to exploit medical advances by identifying       genes carried by some Arabs, then create a genetically modified bacterium or virus.       The intention is to use the ability of viruses and certain bacteria to alter the DNA
       inside their host's living cells. The scientists are trying to engineer deadly
       micro-organisms that attack only those bearing the distinctive genes. The
       programme is based at the biological institute in Nes Tziyona, the main research
       facility for Israel's clandestine arsenal of chemical and biological weapons.
       A scientist there said the task was hugely complicated because both Arabs and
       Jews are of semitic origin. But he added: "They have, however, succeeded in        pinpointing a particular characteristic in the genetic profile of certain Arab
       communities, particularly the Iraqi people." The disease could be spread
        by spraying the organisms into the air or putting them in water supplies.
       The research mirrors biological studies conducted by South African scientists
       during the apartheid era and revealed in testimony before the truth commission.
       The idea of a Jewish state conducting such research has provoked outrage in
       some quarters because of parallels with the genetic experiments of Dr Josef
       Mengele, the Nazi scientist at Auschwitz."
       
 -- Uzi Mahnaimi and Marie Colvin, The Sunday Times [London, 11-15-98]

 

"A good many Israelis see that if conflict with the Arabs

 continues, they are in danger of becoming like the Germans

from 1933 to 1945 -- accomplices if not perpetrators of

permanent oppression."  
Norman Birnbaum, Why, p. M5

"The 'Israeli criterion' as the key indicator in assessing anti-
Semitism has increasingly been widened. The label of anti-Semite
is no longer limited to those who reject the legitimacy of the

Jewish state. Criticism of Israeli governmental policies and

actions has also entered into the calculus ... As the 'Israeli

criterion' for evaluating anti-Semitism has become broader,

it  has more and more impaled individuals and groups on the
liberal-
to-left of the political spectrum on the charge of
anti-Semitism."

Arthur Liebman, 1986, p. 352

"Nor is there solid evidence that marginality increases humaneness.
Freud felt that, on the contrary, Jewish history had produced some

negative psychological results. In his essay, 'Some Character Types

Met with in Psychoanalytic Work,' he discusses the 'exception':
the person who justifies his rebelliousness and claims special

favor to himself by some injury he has suffered and of which he
considers himself blameless. Such people, Freud notes, often feel
quite justified in injuring others. He refers to Shakespeare's Richard
III as a prime example of the type. In the midst of this discussion
Freud notes:'For reasons which will easily be understood I cannot
communicate very much about these and other case histories.
Nor do I propose to go into the obvious analogy between

deformities of character resulting from protracted sickness
in childhood, and the behavior of whole nations, whose

past has been full of suffering.'As [Jewish psychoanalyst]
Theodore Reik points out, thereference is obviously to Jews."

-- Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, 1982, p. 113


"The Holocaust came to be regularly invoked -- indeed,
brandished as a weapon -- in American Jewry's struggles
on behalf of
an embattled Israel."

-- Peter Novick, 1999, p. 145

 

"A guy gets interviewed by a top Israeli general to be an Israeli
spy. As a test, the general asks, 'If you had a chance to kill an
Arab or a cat,
which one would you kill first?' ''Why the cat?'
'You're hired!' the general says."
Joke told by an ulta-Orthodox Jew to Stephen Bloom,
2001, p. 224


 

"The elements of the Jewish heritage that are hostile to non-Jews

have long been known to the world, and anti-Semitic writings

quote them at length. Until recently few would have seriously
asserted that these passages reflect the opinions of Jews in our

own generation. But, when religious extremists inject a

contemporary relevance into these passages ... they acquire a

new and dangerous significance. They provide ammunition for

anti-Semites, who can assert that the true Jewish character is

revealed not when Jews are subjugated in Christian or Muslim

societies, but precisely when they are free. It is in their natural

environment, not in subjugation, that they dare disclose their

true face, and the nations of the world must redefine their

attitudes in view of the strong Jews rather than the impotent Jews."                         

Yehoshafat Harkabi, former head of

Israeli military intelligence, p. 179-180

 

"Only in fantasies about an all-embracing Jewish conspiracy

did a Jewish banker and a Jewish anarchist report to the same

                     boss."                           
Stanislaw Krajewski, Jewish-Polish

author, The Jewish, p. 64

 

"It may be the case that [post-Holocaust] the authentic Jewish

agnostic and the authentic Jewish believer are closer than at

any previous time."
-- Emil Fackenheim, Jewish theologian, in

                                                 Sack, J., p. 135                                    

         


     The central symbol of Jewish identity today is the nation of Israel, the magnet of international Jewish loyalty and allegiance, an obsessive attraction that is difficult for most non-Jews to fathom. Ironically, even relatively few Jews living out of Israel know many details about the Jewish state; large numbers of diaspora Jews know only the religious or Zionist legends about the place, both views grounded in the myths of  Jewish martyrology and redemption. "The vast majority of Jews have no familiarity with the currents of Israeli cultural and even political life," notes Charles Liebman, ".... Those that are devoted to Israel generally focus on the external threat [by non-Jewish nations against Israel] rather than the internal features of Israeli society." [LIEBMAN, Rel Trends, p. 306] "American Jews ... are not interested or knowledgeable [about Israel] as is frequently assumed," says Chaim Waxman, "... In a number of surveys of American Jewish attitudes toward Israel, most of them are quite ignorant not only of Hebrew but of the basic aspects of Israeli society and culture. In a 1986 national sample, only one-third of American Jews were aware of such elementary facts as that Menachem Begin and Shimon Peres are not from the same political party, that Conservative and Reform rabbis cannot officiate weddings in Israel, and that Arab Israeli and Jewish Israeli children do not generally go to the same schools." [WAXMAN, p. 136] Ze'ev Chafets, an American Jew who moved to live permanently in Israel in 1967, notes that
 
       "During the first few months in Jerusalem, I found I knew very little
        about Arabs -- and not much more about Jews ... In the states I had
        been considered pretty Jewish by my friends ... but in Israel I suddenly
        found myself little more than a tourist in what I increasingly wanted to
        see as my own country." [CHAFETS, p. 15-16]
 
    An "age-old ritual" for American Jews who visit Israel is to pay the Jewish National Fund $10 and plant a tree in honor or memory of a friend or relative.  Preying on diaspora sentiment, it is a $50 million-per year business. In 2000 it was discovered by the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv that workers at the popular Jerusalem planting site "cynically uproot the saplings planted by tourists to make way for the new day's busloads." [SONTAG, D., 7-3-2000, p. A4]
 
    "Many American Jews," says Charles Liebman, a professor in Israel, "... have created their own conception of Israel. This is the chunk of Israel that they see and/or imagine they see or they are shown when they visit Israel. Even when they stay for an extended period of time. I am impressed by how vivid this partial image remains. It is not an Israel of self-serving and inept leaders, of a rude populace, and ... an xenophobic culture. Rather, it is a society that excludes universalist sentiment wrapped in symbols of Jewish particularism." [LIEBMAN, p. 309] For most Jews, notes Adam Garfinkle, "Israel is more of an icon than a real place [GARFINKEL, p. 144] ... The Jewish sensibility and the Israeli sensibility is suffused with metaphors of chosenness, slavery, exile (galut), wandering in the wilderness, liberation, a covenant over the land of Israel, and the redemption of it, that resound from Biblical narratives." [GARFINKEL, p. 22]
 
     Many prominent Zionists have restrained, or hidden, fundamental Jewish ethnocentric sentiments to declare pan-human messianic statements about the Jewish state that are, in historical context, as we shall soon see, ludicrous. "Zionism," insisted Solomon Goldman, president of the Zionist Organization of America, "... became a demonstration without parallel of the creative power of justice and democracy." [GAL, A., 1986, p. 381]
 
    Over time, notes Jonathan Sarna, "the Zion [Israel] of the American Jewish imagination, in short, became something of a fantasy land: a seductive heaven-on-earth, where enemies were vanquished, guilt assuaged, hopes realized, and deeply felt longings satisfied." [SARNA, A Proj, p. 41-42]  Marc Ellis, in discussing the work of Israeli author Avishai Margalit, notes that
 
     "In the Jewish context a glimpse of Masada, or the Wall, or the
     Temple Mount is enough to move the 'Jewish heart,' and the
     marketing of Israel takes full advantages of these images. Kitsch
     can also be politicized and become, in Margalit's terms, part of
     state ideology whose 'emblem is total innocence.'" [ELLIS, M., 1990,
     p. 34]
 
     Colin Shindler notes the widespread Jewish American efforts to mythify the Jewish homeland and control its depiction in the world mass media:
 
      "The 'Israel' that was promoted [after 1967] tended to be one of unreal,
      utopian dimensions, where public relations had replaced reality ...
      Obsession with the media spawned new organizations, expensive
      consultants and vigilante journalists to cope with real and imaginary
      anti-Israel bias in the press." [SHINDLER, p. 96-97]

    In 2001, during an extended Palestinian uprising against Israel occupation, when Israeli brutality against Palestinians was becoming difficult to veil, the Jewish state hired a New York public relations company -- Rubenstein Associates -- to control popular perceptions about the place. To improve israel's image, Rubenstein suggested less security guards around prime minister Ariel Sharon and painting Israeli weapons used on Palestinian rioters orange "to make it clear to television viewers that solders are firing nonlethal rounds." Cleaning up after Arab riots was also thought to make for a better image on TV. "But Palestinian officials and young boys interviewed at the Ayosh junction in the West Bank town of Ramallah," noted the Baltimore Sun, "one place singled out by Rubenstein as a problem area, say the proposals prove Israel would rather save face than save lives." [HERMANN, P., 6-29-01]
 
     An Israeli scholar, Boaz Evron, notes that many American Jews "feel ... an obligation toward Israel ... Israel, for them, is not ... a political space devoted to the continuation of a normal national life, but a historical revenge ... [EVRON, p. 110-112] ... Perhaps a main factor in Israel's psychological hold on the Jewish Diaspora is that part of the Diaspora that has lost its religious framework but has remained locked within the Jewish caste and uses Israel as a means of venting its complexes by proxy. These Jews imagine themselves to be part of the Israeli people, while maintaining their own comfortable existence in the Diaspora ... thus Israel deliberately helps Diaspora Jews maintain an illusory existent identity. It is in the obvious interests of the Israeli leadership to prevent such an honest self-appraisal